Log in

No account? Create an account
16 April 2011 @ 02:36 pm
FA Drama  
I hereby release this journal entry into the public domain and authorize anyone to repost and republish in any form on any site, not limited to FA and LJ.

This journal will eventually be posted on FA, and we'll see how long it takes for me to get banned again for it.

What follows is a concise history of recent events:

Friday, I wrote a game modification for some friends on FA, and published the source code. Rather than spamming them with a wall of text and whitespace, I compressed the code and appended it to the small-resolution preview image and uploaded it to FA, so that my description with explanation and directions for using the code wouldn't appear below all the code itself, and the whole thing was sized less than 100kb. Creative circumvention of the technical limitations of FA? yes. Against site policy? no.

Someone on IRC took offense to the fact that I was using FA for something other than his fap material, and reported it to the admins, upon which witchiebunny took the ticket and summarily deleted my submission without due course, and sent me a note saying that it was removed for being a screenshot. I corrected her, pointing out that the screenshot was just the preview image, and that preview images ("thumbnails") were exempt from said content restrictions according to the AUP, and that my source code, being text written by myself, was likewise permitted.

Witchiebunny, refusing to acknowledge her mistake, instead constructed a strawman argument to attack in defense of her decision, and turned confirmation bias up to eleven. I responded by pointing out that her self-justification was unprofessional and just skirting the issue, to which she tried changing the rules, saying that even as a thumbnail, screenshots were disallowed (which isn't true according to the AUP). I responded in kind, saying that if this was the case, she should be enforcing this unilaterally, by deleting half of ALL the non-graphical-art submissions on FA, as they all used preview images that relied on the thumbnail exemption from the AUP. Her arguments continued to spiral downhill, until I got her to basically reaffirm my position in the argument in her own words, not realizing it. When I pointed that out, she played the "my word is final" card and the power card ("don't mess with me, I'm an admin, so I can ban you.") and then blocked me from replying to her.

Amidst all of this, I and some others were having a good laugh at her childish behavior, and when I mentioned her name, I was immediately filled in about her reputation as an admin of the TFP steam group, always kicking good players from the opposing team to keep her own team from losing.

So I posted a journal, very briefly mentioning that she had deleted my submission and then blocked me from replying in order to win the argument, and how I thought this sounded right in line with the other things I was hearing about her administrative exploits elsewhere (although I did not name any specifics or more details than that). I got a number of responses to that journal, mostly other people reaffirming our opinions that she was a bad admin, and someone thinking she had been removed as an admin before.

I returned the next morning to find that Summercat had banned me from FA, "for posting a journal (now removed) calling out an admin for justified removal and warning.[sic]"

So apparently, according to Summercat, accurately reporting on administrative behavior on FA is a bannable offense. He also claims that "[the issue was brought up by witchiebunny] to several admins for review, myself included."

Well, since this journal is already in FA bannable territory, let me just go on to name a few more admins who might follow this twisted line of thinking:

ArshesNei: holier-than-thou whiteknight on a high horse with a massive superiority complex, believes in might-is-right and jumps at any opportunity to back her fellow admins.

Dragoneer: Resident donation-monger, useless puppet and supporter of pedophiles and zoophiles everywhere. Covers up for rapists and animal abuses, and tips them off to help them hide from the law. Cares only about his own popularity, and never thinks about the consequences of his actions.

Summercat: Gets a hard-on for exerting his authority for enforcing rules, regardless of their wording or intent, and makes up his own rules to enforce, like a gradeschool kid lording over his first clubhouse.

and of course, Witchiebunny: openly abuses admin powers to selfish ends, can never admit mistakes or wrongdoings, or allow herself to lose on fair terms, even in a videogame.

Lest you think this is all some juvenile rebellion against authority, here is a list of some admins who don't suck, are even-tempered, level-headed and forward-thinking, all qualities this site needs:


Unfortunately, all of these admins have resigned at some point in the last 3 years, just another indication of the direction the site is headed. Ultimately, I don't care anymore, because I know turning FA around is a lost cause with an admin team like that, and I have no stake in it. They can ban me for speaking truth, but they can't stop the truth from getting out, and frankly, I don't care if they ban me, because I'm just waiting for a better site to take off, anyway.

Best of luck to Inaki and crew on floof.
Cap'n Earthshine Saicincaptainsaicin on April 17th, 2011 10:49 pm (UTC)
Well, the problem with revolution is that it works, but sowing the seeds of discontent will never accomplish it so long as no one is willing to take the step of putting their own account on the line. I doubt this will make any serious waves, but I feel I have the right to express this, and indeed I do, so I will... and they will want to ban me for it, even though it's not against their policy, because they can, so they probably will.

She is saying that I'm asking for it, and will lose the fight... and I am, and I will, because it's their site... but I still stand to question that, if I don't let this affect me, have I really lost?

The real question now that I would like to see answered, is whether they are willing to permaban me for calling them out, knowing full-well that they can't silence me and the word will still get out. Because in the past, they've still had some level-headed staff, and they haven't. If this has changed, and they really don't care enough about anyone's opinions to let that get in their way of banning me because they don't like what I have to say, then I really don't WANT to be a part of that site anymore, anyway.

I called them out before on their "we support freedom of speech" crock-of-shit during the whole cub art debacle, when they claimed that as they reason they were willing to risk being blacklisted as illegal in the EU and risk losing or making criminals of all their European users in favor of allowing cub porn... and I was proven right, when they repealed that decision over losing donation money.

I'm calling them out on it again now, expecting them to prove me right again, by banning me, because I won't stand for that kind of hypocrisy. We live in a day and age where freedom of speech is a much more contested subject, especially with the advent of corporate censorship on the web. It's becoming such a problem that we need to start reexamining state action doctrine--the idea that only the state can violate the first amendment. As we depend more and more heavily on communication in the digital realm, the people who now control what we can and can't say online need to be held to a higher level of accountability for violating our right to free speech. As an advocate of freedom go speech, I will not stand for the attitude of "we support free speech, but, this is OUR internet, and you're just using it, so, we don't see a problem with censoring you, because using OUR internet is a privilege." Even if it's coming from just a low level gatekeeper, like FA. It's one thing for a smaller site to be privately owned, and state that they have the final say on things, but it's another for a site to CLAIM they support free speech, while manipulating it behind the scenes, and it's especially disturbing because that's the direction that free speech as a whole is headed in many countries now, including, even, America. That's why I'm making a stand against FA on this, and God as my witness, if the day comes that freedom of speech is taken away in this country, I'll be one of the ones taking up arms and making a stand here, too, because I will not compromise on it.